A National Partnership Working for Fair and Impartial Courts
Contact Us Home April 22, 2018
76 % of Americans believe campaign contributions have at least some impact on a judge's courtroom decisions.
Source: Justice at Stake national poll
 

Missouri

Supreme Court Justices: 7

Method of Selection: gubernatorial appointment from nominating commission

Method of Retention: reelection

Length of Term: 12 years

 

Summary:

 

  • In 2012, 76 percent of voters rejected Amendment 3, a proposed constitutional amendment to give Missouri's governor a greater hand in picking the nominating commission that screens top judicial candidates. The vote "will send a strong message around the country not to tamper with a system that has helped insulate judges from politics for decades," said Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg.

 

 

  •  In  2008, critics of Missouri's merit selection formed an initiative for direct elections. They failed to gather enough valid signatures to put the ballot issue before voters in November 2010.

 

  • Missouri legislators beat back in 2008 a fierce campaign to tamper with the state's commission nomination system, which dates to 1940 and is the nation's oldest.

 

  • Also in 2008, voters in Greene County chose to replace elections for local judges with a nonpartisan judicial nominating commission.

 

  • 71% of polled Missourians were happy with the current judicial selection system according to survey conducted by Justice at Stake in 2007.

 

 

To Learn More;

 
 
 
The positions and policies of Justice at Stake publications and campaign partners are their own, and do not necessarily reflect those of other campaign partners or board members.
Website Design in Iowa by Global Reach