
Campaign Spending and the Courts
Once quiet, low-budget affairs, state Supreme Court elections are now marked by runaway spending by special interest groups, which see judicial elections as an inexpensive investment to bend courts to their agendas.
This change has caused deep concern among leading jurists, and among the general public, that campaign spending for judicial candidates could translate to favorable treatment in the courtroom. There is a growing perception that justice is “for sale.”
Spending Data
In just seven years, 2000-2007, the amount raised by state Supreme Court candidates more than doubled the total raised in the entire 1990s: ($167.8 million, compared with $87.7 million, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics.)
Poll Data: What the public, judges and business leaders think about judicial campaign spending
Notable Quotes: What leading legal authorities say about the danger to American courts
Home | History | Spending | Debate | Reforms | Poll | Resources | Grisham | Commentaries | JAS Brief | Quotes

