Supreme Court Decision Fails to Address Threat to State Courts
Damage from Soaring Special Interest Spending in Judicial Elections to Continue
WASHINGTON, D.C., June 25, 2012 - The following statement was issued today by Bert Brandenburg, executive director of Justice at Stake, on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s decision in American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock:
“Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s decision ignores the damage that special interest money is inflicting on America’s state courts. The threat to fair and impartial elected courts in America is even clearer now than when Citizens United was issued.
“Deep-pocketed special interest groups are pouring money into judicial elections to push courts to decide cases in their favor. Common-sense election reforms are more necessary than ever, to protect our courts and other democratic institutions.”
In the last decade, campaign fundraising in state supreme court elections more than doubled, from $83.3 million in 1990-1999 to $206.9 million in 2000-2009. Special interest groups accounted for at least $39 million in additional TV ad spending in 2000-09, according to a report co-authored by Justice at Stake, and total independent spending on court elections is believed to be significantly higher.
Justice at Stake, along with eight retired Montana Supreme Court Justices, filed an amicus brief urging the Court to deny certiorari, allowing the Montana ruling to stand, or in the alternative, to schedule the case for full briefing and argument. You can view the amicus brief by clicking here. Justice at Stake’s statement of Jan. 22, 2010, about the Citizens United ruling is available by clicking here.
