WASHINGTON, DC, February 12 – Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg issued this statement today, following passage of a bill by the Arizona House Judiciary Committee to expand the State Supreme Court from five to seven members.
Washington, D.C., January 22 – Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg issued this statement today, following passage by both houses of Wisconsin’s state legislature of a proposed constitutional amendment to change the way the state’s Chief Justice is selected:
Washington, D.C., January 21 – Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg issued this statement marking today’s fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision:
WASHINGTON, D.C, January 20 — In tonight’s State of the Union address, President Obama drew much-needed attention to the growing problem of dark money in politics when he said, “A better politics is one where we spend less time drowning in dark money for ads that pull us into the gutter, and spend more time lifting young people up, with a sense of purpose and possibility, and asking them to join in the great mission of building America.” Bert Brandenburg, Executive Director of Justice at Stake, issued the following statement:
WASHINGTON, D.C, January 20 —Bert Brandenburg, Executive Director of Justice at Stake, issued the following statement on Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar:
WASHINGTON, D.C., December 24 – Florida’s rule prohibiting judges and judicial candidates from personally soliciting campaign contributions helps protect judges against the appearance of judicial bias and bolsters the public’s confidence in the fairness of our courts, the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and others argued in an amicus brief filed today.
WASHINGTON, D.C., December 18 – In response to a bill, HB 3022 , filed in the South Carolina legislature that would prevent state judges from recognizing or upholding marriage rights for same-sex couples, and stipulating that judges who do not dismiss cases regarding these rights will be automatically removed from the case and not be paid, Justice at Stake Director of State Affairs Debra Erenberg issued the following statement:
TV ad spending in state Supreme Court elections by outside groups, political parties, and candidates has surged to more than $13.8 million since January, surpassing the $12.2 million spent on TV advertising in the 2010 midterm elections, according to an analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice and Justice at Stake of estimates provided by Kantar Media/CMAG.
Total TV ad spending in a hard-fought Montana Supreme Court election rose to a record $291,280, fueled by checks from national groups like the Republican State Leadership Committee and Americans for Prosperity, as well as Montanans for Liberty and Justice, supported by trial attorneys
In the first election cycle since state lawmakers eliminated North Carolina’s popular public financing program for judicial elections, spending on the state’s Supreme Court race shattered records, according to state and national fair-courts advocates.
Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg issued the following statement after Illinois voters on Tuesday retained a new 10-year term for state Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier:
When Kansas voters rejected an eleventh-hour campaign to remove two top judges over a single ruling, they affirmed the importance of keeping politics out of the courtroom, Justice at Stake said.
Tennesseans’ vote to approve Amendment 2 represents a good step toward keeping politics out of the courtroom but leaves more work to be done, Justice at Stake said on Wednesday. The ballot measure will write into the state Constitution a modified Federal-style system for picking appellate judges.
With less than a week until Election Day, special interest groups have dramatically increased TV ad spending to influence state Supreme Court races in Illinois, Michigan, Montana, North Carolina, and Ohio
Candidates for North Carolina’s Supreme Court have raised a record breaking $2.9 million in campaign funds this election cycle, according to an analysis of publicly available state campaign disclosure filings by Justice at Stake and the Brennan Center for Justice.
With less than two weeks to November 4th, political parties, outside groups, and state Supreme Court candidates have spent more than $9.1 million on TV ads this election cycle, including primaries and off cycle elections, according to FCC filings, campaign financial disclosures, and estimates from Kantar Media/CMAG analyzed by Justice at Stake and the Brennan Center for Justice.
Illinois state Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier, whose 2004 election battle against Gordon Maag set spending records at the time, is facing a surge in independent spending by a group opposing his retention.
A pre-election poll of 579 Cole County, Missouri likely voters shows nearly three-quarters of them concerned about outside special interest money pouring into their county’s circuit court election.
Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg made the following statement in reacting to reports that a partisan group based in Washington, D.C. has channeled $200,000 into Missouri to help fund a lower-court judicial candidate in a politically important jurisdiction:
In March of 2013, JAS issued a statement highlighting the urgency of the legislature acting to preserve the judicial nominating commission, which stood at the core of the Tennessee Plan, in which Bert Brandenburg called it "troubling"...
Spending on television advertising airtime has topped $1 million in three contested races for the Michigan Supreme Court, as the state Republican Party began an ad campaign touting its nominees, according to an analysis by Justice at Stake...
The Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) began airing television ads in Montana’s State Supreme court election this week, as spending by non-candidate groups makes its entrance into the race.
With less than one month remaining before the Nov. 4 elections, candidates for the North Carolina Supreme Court have booked more than $1 million worth of TV airtime for campaign ads in the four contested races.
Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg issued the following statement about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to consider an appeal in Lanell Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar:
Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg issued the following statement on today’s announcement by the American Judicature Society that it will close its doors: