A National Partnership Working for Fair and Impartial Courts
Contact Us Home May 24, 2013
"The improper appearance created by money in judicial elections is one of the most important issues facing our judicial system today."
Theodore B. Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General and attorney in Caperton v. Massey case
 

Civil Liberties & National Security

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor"A state of war is not a blank check for the President when it comes to the rights of the Nation’s citizens."

–Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Hamdi v.Rumsfeld

 

“At times, some efforts to bypass the courts seem to have less to do with fighting terror than evading accountability.”  

 Bert Brandenburg, "Courting Danger" (published 2006)

 

Protecting Civil Liberties in Troubled Times

The courts uphold our liberties, provided they have the authority to do so in our system of checks and balances. Since the terrorist attacks of 2001, however, the USA PATRIOT Act and other policies have weakened the historic power of courts to protect our rights and check possible government abuses.

In May 2011, President Obama signed a four-year extension of the USA PATRIOT Act, including several provisions allowing seizure of records and wire-tapping without a court-issued warrant. 


To learn more: See Justice at Stake's "Courting Danger" report (2006)

 

 
 
 
The positions and policies of Justice at Stake publications and campaign partners are their own, and do not necessarily reflect those of other campaign partners or board members.
Website Design in Iowa by Global Reach