
Diversity in the Courts
In order to function effectively, every American must have the utmost confidence in their courts. However, a judiciary that does not reflect the population it serves undermines that confidence in creating a perceived or actual bias in judicial decision making. An ideal bench is representative of the larger community, including women, persons of color, members of the LGBT community, persons with disabilities and other underrepresented groups.
Justice at Stake believes that diversity in the legal system improves the quality of justice, while building confidence in all communities that American courts are fair and impartial. This page celebrates the achievements of those who played pioneering roles in American legal history. These individuals overcame enormous obstacles and paved the way for others to achieve careers in the legal world.
To learn more about these pioneers, click on the link below their picture.

Judge Constance Baker Motley Judge Vaughn Walker Patsy Takemoto Mink Oliver Hill

Attorney General Eric Holder Justice Elena Kagan Justice Thurgood Marshall Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor William T. Coleman Judge Patricia Wald Judge Jane Bolin
Justice at Stake, in coordination with its partners, is taking concrete steps towards increasing diversity on the bench. JAS is engaged in important work advocating and improving judicial diversity. In May of 2011, JAS released a comprehensive guide to gaining a federal judgeship targeted at underrepresented populations. “The Path to the Federal Bench: A ‘How To’ Guide on Pursuing a Federal Judgeship” was written to demystify the intricacies of pursuing a judgeship and provide a comprehensive account of the journey to the bench compiled in one, easy to use document.
JAS has also begun work in Washington as part of a pilot project to increase judicial diversity across the state. We prepared and sponsored a day of panels at the Washington Minority Bar Associations Collaboration Project (WAMBAC) Conference, on May 20, 2011. The panels highlighted important steps to a judgeship, culminating in thirteen judges, from all court levels, discussing their own unique paths to the bench. Watch the panel discussion.
